Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 15.460
Filtrar
1.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging ; 17(4): e016435, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626096

RESUMO

Heart valve replacement has steadily increased over the past decades due to improved surgical mortality, an aging population, and the increasing use of transcatheter valve technology. With these developments, prosthetic valve complications, including prosthetic valve endocarditis, are increasingly encountered. In this review, we aim to characterize the manifestations of prosthetic valve endocarditis using representative case studies from our institution to highlight the advances and contributions of modern multimodality imaging techniques.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Idoso , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico por imagem , Endocardite Bacteriana/terapia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Endocardite/diagnóstico por imagem , Endocardite/etiologia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Imagem Multimodal , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/terapia
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 83(14): 1326-1337, 2024 Apr 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38569763

RESUMO

Cardiac implantable electronic device-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE) encompasses a range of clinical syndromes, including valvular, device lead, and bloodstream infections. However, accurately diagnosing CIED-IE remains challenging owing in part to diverse clinical presentations, lack of standardized definition, and variations in guideline recommendations. Furthermore, current diagnostic modalities, such as transesophageal echocardiography and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography have limited sensitivity and specificity, further contributing to diagnostic uncertainty. This can potentially result in complications and unnecessary costs associated with inappropriate device extraction. Six hypothetical clinical cases that exemplify the diverse manifestations of CIED-IE are addressed herein. Through these cases, we highlight the importance of optimizing diagnostic accuracy and stewardship, understanding different pathogen-specific risks for bloodstream infections, guiding appropriate device extraction, and preventing CIED-IE, all while addressing key knowledge gaps. This review both informs clinicians and underscores crucial areas for future investigation, thereby shedding light on this complex and challenging syndrome.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Marca-Passo Artificial , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Sepse , Humanos , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Endocardite/diagnóstico , Endocardite/etiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/complicações
3.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(4S Suppl 2): S200-S203, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556673

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for patients with end-stage cardiac failure awaiting heart transplantation has become increasingly common. However, ventricular assist device-related infections remain a major problem complicating their long-term use. Retrospective review has previously shown a decrease in lifetime return to operating room (RTOR) with no change in 90-day complications when a muscle or omental flap is used for coverage after washout for infection. We wished to determine if early plastic surgery intervention led to a decreased length of stay for these patients. METHODS: Patients with LVAD readmitted for LVAD infection at a single institution from 2008 to 2021 were identified using a preexisting database. Patients were followed retrospectively for an average of 3.2 years. Patient demographics, preoperative diagnosis/disease state, type of ventricular assist device inserted, postoperative day of ventricular assist device infection onset, definitive device coverage, timing of coverage procedure after the initial washout for infection, type of flap used for coverage, 90-day complications after definitive coverage, and lifetime return to operating room for infection were reviewed. Comparison analysis with χ2 and analysis of variance testing was used to analyze outcomes. RESULTS: Of 568 patients admitted with an LVAD infection, 104 underwent operative debridement and closure by plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) or cardiothoracic surgery (CTS). Fifty-three underwent PRS closure, and 51 underwent CTS closure. There was an increased incidence of diabetes among the PRS group (P < 0.001); otherwise, there was no difference in baseline characteristics. There was increased RTOR over a lifetime with CTS closure compared with PRS (P = 0.03) and increased 90-day risk of infection (P = 0.007). Patients with PRS closure had an increased risk of postoperative hematoma (P = 046). Plastic and reconstructive surgery was typically consulted on hospital day 10. Both PRS and CTS closure patients were discharged on postoperative day 7, on average (P = 0.542). CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgery involvement with surgical decision making and closure of infected LVAD devices has a decrease in lifetime RTOR and decreased 90-day complications related to infections. There may be a benefit to earlier PRS consultation for coverage assessment.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Salas Cirúrgicas , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 248, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561717

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obesity represents an epidemic of rising numbers worldwide year after year. In the Orthopedic field, obesity is one of the major causes leading to osteoarthritis needing Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA). Still, contextually, it represents one of the most significant risk factors for joint replacement complications and failures. So, bariatric Surgery (BS) is becoming a valuable option for weight control and mitigating obesity-related risk factors. This review of the literature and meta-analysis aims to evaluate periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) and surgical site infections (SSI) rates in patients who underwent TKA after BS compared to obese patients without BS. METHODS: Systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines up to October 2023. We included longitudinal studies comparing obese patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty after bariatric surgery (study group) and obese patients who underwent TKA (control group). The surgical site infection and Periprosthetic joint infection rate were compared among groups using a meta-analytical approach. RESULTS: The online database and references investigation identified one hundred and twenty-five studies. PJI rate differed significantly among groups, (z = -21.8928, p < 0.0001), with a lower risk in the BS group (z = -10.3114, p < 0.0001), for SSI, instead, not statistically significance were recorded (z = -0.6784, p = 0.4975). CONCLUSIONS: The current Literature suggests that Bariatric Surgery can reduce infectious complications in TKA, leading to better outcomes and less related costs treating of knee osteoarthritis in obese patients.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Cirurgia Bariátrica , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/cirurgia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/epidemiologia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/complicações , Artrite Infecciosa/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos
6.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 25(3): 240-246, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588520

RESUMO

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common inpatient and outpatient surgical procedures performed in the United States and is predicted to increase 401% by 2040. Surgical site infections (SSIs) at an incidence rate of approximately 2% are costly post-operative complications in TKA. Intra-operative surgical irrigants are used to decrease contaminating microbial bioburden within the surgical site to prevent SSI. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of a novel surgical irrigant called XPERIENCE® Advanced Surgical Irrigation (XP; Next Science, Jacksonville, FL) on SSI incidence in primary TKA performed at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC). Patients and Methods: Primary TKAs were performed at a free-standing ASC. The novel surgical irrigant was used intra-operatively to rinse away debris and micro-organisms from the surgical site. Retrospective data collation included SSI rates, complication rates, and re-admissions due to SSI within 90 days of index surgery. Results: Among the 524 primary TKA surgeries, one peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) was diagnosed within 90 days of index surgery and one superficial incisional SSI was diagnosed within 30 days of index surgery. The PJI was attributed to an exogenously acquired upper respiratory tract infection rather than due to the failure of intra-operative regimes. The 0.19% PJI incidence rate indicated significant efficacy of XP in decreasing PJI. An overall complication rate of 7.82% was noted with none of the complications associated with usage of the novel surgical irrigant. Conclusions: XPERIENCE is a promising intra-operative antimicrobial irrigant that can be easily incorporated into a broader infection prevention strategy.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Incidência , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos
7.
Acta Orthop ; 95: 166-173, 2024 Apr 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38595072

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Revisions due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are underestimated in national arthroplasty registries. Our primary objective was to assess the validity in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register (DKR) of revisions performed due to PJI against the Healthcare-Associated Infections Database (HAIBA). The secondary aim was to describe the cumulative incidences of revision due to PJI within 1 year of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) according to the DKR, HAIBA, and DKR/HAIBA combined. METHODS: This longitudinal observational cohort study included 56,305 primary TKAs (2010-2018), reported in both the DKR and HAIBA. In the DKR, revision performed due to PJI was based on pre- and intraoperative assessment disclosed by the surgeon immediately after surgery. In HAIBA, PJI was identified from knee-related revision procedures coinciding with 2 biopsies with identical microbiological pathogens. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of revision due to PJI in the DKR (vs. HAIBA, within 1 year of TKA) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Cumulative incidences were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The DKR's sensitivity for PJI revision was 58% (CI 53-62) and varied by TKA year (41%-68%) and prosthetic type (31% for monoblock; 63% for modular). The specificity was 99.8% (CI 99.7-99.8), PPV 64% (CI 62-72), and NPV 99.6% (CI 99.6-99.7). 80% of PJI cases not captured by the DKR were caused by non-reporting rather than misclassification. 33% of PJI cases in the DKR or HAIBA were culture-negative. Considering potential misclassifications, the best-case sensitivity was 64%. The cumulative incidences of PJI were 0.8% in the DKR, 0.9% in HAIBA, and 1.1% when combining data. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of revision due to PJI in the DKR was 58%. The cumulative incidence of PJI within 1 year after TKA was highest (1.1%) when combining the DKR and HAIBA, showing that incorporating microbiology data into arthroplasty registries can enhance PJI validity.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Incidência , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Sistema de Registros , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Reoperação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 83(15): 1418-1430, 2024 Apr 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599718

RESUMO

During the past 6 decades, there have been numerous changes in prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), currently affecting an older population and increasing in incidence in patients with transcatheter-implanted valves. Significant microbiologic (molecular biology) and imaging diagnostic (fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography) advances have been incorporated into the 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases infective endocarditis diagnostic criteria, thus increasing the diagnostic sensitivity for PVE without sacrificing specificity in validation studies. PVE is a life-threatening disease requiring management by multidisciplinary endocarditis teams in cardiac centers to improve outcomes. Novel surgical options are now available, and an increasing set of patients may avoid surgical intervention despite indication. Selected patients may complete parenteral or oral antimicrobial treatment at home. Finally, patients with prosthetic valves implanted surgically or by the transcatheter approach are candidates for antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocardite Bacteriana/terapia , Endocardite Bacteriana/complicações , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/terapia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Endocardite/diagnóstico , Endocardite/etiologia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos
9.
Angiol. (Barcelona) ; 76(2): 109-112, Mar-Abr. 2024. ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-232386

RESUMO

Introducción: la infección de prótesis aórtica en la cirugía vascular convencional es un evento catastrófico, con una alta tasa de morbilidad y de mortalidad. El tratamiento tradicional ha sido la remoción de la prótesis y la reconstrucción con bypass extraanatómico. En algunos casos, se ha llevado a cabo el reemplazo con prótesis impregnadas en antibiótico; en otros, el reemplazo con vena femoral superficial y también la cirugía abierta con drenaje de las colecciones asociadas y antibioticoterapia de por vida. Caso clínico: se presenta el reporte de un caso de infección protésica tratada con drenajes de las colecciones y antibioticoterapia de larga duración, con un resultado favorable un año después de su complicación. Discusión: en algunos casos, dada la severidad del paciente, es posible intentar un tratamiento conservador de esta nefasta complicación.(AU)


Introduction: in traditional vascular surgery, aortic prosthesis infection is a catastrophic event with high morbidity andmortality rates. Traditional treatment is the removal of the valve followed by extra-anatomic bypass reconstruction. Insome cases, antibiotic-impregnated prosthesis replacement has been performed. In others, superficial femoral veinreplacement, and open surgery with drainage of the associated collections and lifelong antibiotic therapy.Case report: this is the case of a patient with aortic prosthesis infection undergoing draining collections and lifelongantibiotic therapy with a favorable outcome 1 year after the complication.Discussion: in some cases, given the severity of the patient, we can try to treat this dreaded complication conservativel.(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Terapias Complementares , Próteses e Implantes/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico
10.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 14: 1356804, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38500507

RESUMO

Objective: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) across synovial fluid, prosthetic sonicate fluid, and periprosthetic tissues among patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), intending to optimize specimen selection for mNGS in these patients. Methods: This prospective study involved 61 patients undergoing revision arthroplasty between September 2021 and September 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Among them, 43 cases were diagnosed as PJI, and 18 as aseptic loosening (AL) based on the American Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Preoperative or intraoperative synovial fluid, periprosthetic tissues, and prosthetic sonicate fluid were collected, each divided into two portions for mNGS and culture. Comparative analyses were conducted between the microbiological results and diagnostic efficacy derived from mNGS and culture tests. Furthermore, the variability in mNGS diagnostic efficacy for PJI across different specimen types was assessed. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of mNGS diagnosis was 93% and 94.4% for all types of PJI specimens; the sensitivity and specificity of culture diagnosis was 72.1% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity of mNGS was significantly higher than that of culture (X2 = 6.541, P=0.011), with no statistically significant difference in specificity (X2 = 1.029, P=0.310). The sensitivity of the synovial fluid was 83.7% and the specificity was 94.4%; the sensitivity of the prosthetic sonicate fluid was 90.7% and the specificity was 94.4%; and the sensitivity of the periprosthetic tissue was 81.4% and the specificity was 100%. Notably, the mNGS of prosthetic sonicate fluid displayed a superior pathogen detection rate compared to other specimen types. Conclusion: mNGS can function as a precise diagnostic tool for identifying pathogens in PJI patients using three types of specimens. Due to its superior ability in pathogen identification, prosthetic sonicate fluid can replace synovial fluid and periprosthetic tissue as the optimal sample choice for mNGS.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Artrite Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala
11.
Bone Joint J ; 106-B(4): 372-379, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555938

RESUMO

Aims: Histology is widely used for diagnosis of persistent infection during reimplantation in two-stage revision hip and knee arthroplasty, although data on its utility remain scarce. Therefore, this study aims to assess the predictive value of permanent sections at reimplantation in relation to reinfection risk, and to compare results of permanent and frozen sections. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 226 patients (90 hips, 136 knees) with periprosthetic joint infection who underwent two-stage revision between August 2011 and September 2021, with a minimum follow-up of one year. Histology was assessed via the SLIM classification. First, we analyzed whether patients with positive permanent sections at reimplantation had higher reinfection rates than patients with negative histology. Further, we compared permanent and frozen section results, and assessed the influence of anatomical regions (knee versus hip), low- versus high-grade infections, as well as first revision versus multiple prior revisions on the histological result at reimplantation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), chi-squared tests, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated. Results: Overall, the reinfection rate was 18%. A total of 14 out of 82 patients (17%) with positive permanent sections at reimplantation experienced reinfection, compared to 26 of 144 patients (18%) with negative results (p = 0.996). Neither permanent sections nor fresh frozen sections were significantly associated with reinfection, with a sensitivity of 0.35, specificity of 0.63, PPV of 0.17, NPV of 0.81, and accuracy of 58%. Histology was not significantly associated with reinfection or survival time for any of the analyzed sub-groups. Permanent and frozen section results were in agreement for 91% of cases. Conclusion: Permanent and fresh frozen sections at reimplantation in two-stage revision do not serve as a reliable predictor for reinfection.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Prótese de Quadril , Prótese do Joelho , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Prótese do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Prótese de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reinfecção , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Reoperação/métodos
12.
J Infect Public Health ; 17(4): 712-718, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484416

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis continues to be a significant concern and may be undergoing an epidemiological transition. METHODS: Were studied 1804 consecutive episodes of infective endocarditis between 1978 and 2022. The mean age was 48 ( ± 19), and 1162 (64%) patients were male. Temporal trends in demographic data, comorbidities, predisposing conditions, microorganisms, complications and in-hospital death have been studied over the decades (1978-1988, 1989-1999, 2000-2010 and 2011-2022). The outcomes and clinical characteristics were modeled using nonlinear cubic spline functions. FINDINGS: Valve surgery was performed in 50% of the patients and overall in-hospital mortality was 30%. From the first to the fourth decade studied, the average age of patients increased from 29 to 57 years (p < 0.001), with significant declines in the occurrence of rheumatic valvular heart disease (15% to 6%; p < 0.001) and streptococcal infections (46% to 33%; p < 0.001). Healthcare-associated infections have increased (9% to 21%; p < 0.001), as have prosthetic valve endocarditis (26% to 53%; p < 0.001), coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections (4% to 11%; p < 0.001), and related-complications (heart failure, embolic events, and perivalvular abscess; p < 0.001). These changes were associated with a decline in adjusted in-hospital mortality from 34% to 25% (p = 0.019). INTERPRETATION: In the 44 years studied, there was an increase in the mean age of patients, healthcare-related, prosthetic valve, coagulase-negative staphylococci/MRSA infections, and related complications. Notably, these epidemiological changes were associated with a decline in the adjusted in-hospital mortality.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Endocardite Bacteriana/cirurgia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Coagulase , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Endocardite/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus , Infecções Estafilocócicas/complicações
13.
J Orthop Traumatol ; 25(1): 15, 2024 Mar 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38528169

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the time to reimplantation (TTR) during two-stage revision using static spacers with regard to treatment success and function in patients with chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee. METHODS: 163 patients (median age 72 years, 72 women) who underwent two-stage exchange for chronic knee PJI between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed (based on the 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria). A cutoff TTR for increased risk of reinfection was identified using the maximally selected log-rank statistic. Infection control, aseptic revisions and overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Adjustment for confounding factors-the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and C-reactive protein (CRP)-was done with a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: When TTR exceeded 94 days, the adjusted hazard of reinfection was increased 2.8-fold (95% CI 1.4-5.7; p = 0.0036). The reinfection-free rate was 67% (95% CI 52-79%) after 2 years and 33% (95% CI 11-57%) after 5 years for a longer TTR compared to 89% (95% CI 81-94%) and 80% (95% CI 69-87%) at 2 and 5 years, respectively, for a shorter TTR. Adjusted overall survival and number of aseptic revisions did not differ between the longer TTR and shorter TTR groups. Maximum knee flexion was 90° (IQR 84-100) for a longer TTR and 95° (IQR 90-100) for a shorter TTR (p = 0.0431), with no difference between the groups in Oxford Knee Score. Baseline characteristics were similar (body mass index, age, previous surgeries, microorganisms) for the two groups, except that there was a higher CCI (median 4 vs. 3) and higher CRP (median 3.7 vs 2.6 mg/dl) in the longer TTR group. CONCLUSION: A long TTR is sometimes unavoidable in clinical practice, but surgeons should be aware of a potentially higher risk of reinfection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Artroplastia do Joelho , Prótese do Joelho , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reinfecção/complicações , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Proteína C-Reativa , Reoperação , Reimplante/efeitos adversos , Artrite Infecciosa/complicações , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Prótese do Joelho/efeitos adversos
14.
Int Wound J ; 21(3): e14726, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453151

RESUMO

This umbrella review aim to explore the effect of topical antibiotics in infection prevention after primary joint arthroplasty, and provide a specific theoretical basis for clinical treatment. The review process was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and the Cochrane Library on infection prevention by topical antibiotics from inception to 10 April 2023. The two researchers individually and strictly screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, performed the literature quality evaluation and data extraction, and used Stata 17 for data analysis. This study included six studies with one systematic review and five meta-analyses. The pooled analysis showed that topical antibiotic administration effectively reduced the incidence of overall infection and periprosthetic joint infection. However, it does not reduce the risk of superficial infection. Besides, the topic of antibiotics significantly increases the incidence of other sterile complications of the incision. According to the current evidence, topical application of antibiotics can reduce the incidence of overall infection and periprosthetic joint infection after primary joint arthroplasty. Although it increases the incidence of complications such as delayed healing of incisions, the pros and cons should be weighed in clinical decision making. However, they should not be discarded due to side effects.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Metanálise como Assunto
15.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 106(7): 582-589, 2024 Apr 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38324646

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of computer navigation or robotic assistance during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has yielded numerous benefits due to more accurate component positioning. The utilization of these tools is generally associated with longer operative times and also necessitates additional surgical equipment and personnel in the operating room. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of technology assistance on periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary THA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records for 12,726 patients who had undergone primary THA at a single high-volume institution between 2018 and 2021. Patients were stratified by surgical technique (conventional THA, computer-navigated THA [CN-THA], or robotic-assisted THA [RA-THA]) and were matched 1:1 with use of propensity score matching. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the rates of PJI within 90 days postoperatively between the cohorts. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, there were 4,006 patients in the THA versus RA-THA analysis (2,003 in each group) and 5,288 patients in the THA versus CN-THA analysis (2,644 in each group). CN-THA (p < 0.001) and RA-THA (p < 0.001) were associated with longer operative times compared with conventional THA by 3 and 11 minutes, respectively. The rates of PJI after conventional THA (0.2% to 0.4%) were similar to those after CN-THA (0.4%) and RA-THA (0.4%). On the basis of logistic regression, the development of PJI was not associated with the use of computer navigation (odds ratio [OR], 1.8 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.7 to 5.3]; p = 0.232) or robotic assistance (OR, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.3 to 2.3]; p = 0.808). CONCLUSIONS: Despite longer operative times associated with the use of computer navigation and robotic assistance, the use of these tools was not associated with an increased risk of PJI within 90 days after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Quadril , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos de Coortes , Artrite Infecciosa/complicações , Fatores de Risco
16.
J Clin Microbiol ; 62(4): e0148623, 2024 Apr 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38415637

RESUMO

Enrichment of periprosthetic tissue samples in blood culture bottles (BCBs) for microbiological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) is more reliable than the use of an enrichment broth. Nevertheless, the extremely time-consuming homogenization of the samples for BCB processing has so far limited its use, especially in high-throughput settings. We aimed to establish a highly scalable homogenization process of tissue samples for long-term incubation in BCBs. A protocol for homogenization of tissue samples using bead beating was established and validated. In a second step, the use of the homogenate for enrichment in BCBs was compared to the use of thioglycolate broth (TB) in terms of diagnostic accuracy using clinical tissue samples from 150 patients with suspected PJI. Among 150 analyzed samples, 35 samples met the microbiological criteria for PJI. Using BCB, 32 of 35 (91.4%) PJI were detected compared to 30 of 35 (85.7%) by TB. The use of BCB had a lower secondary contamination rate (2/115; 1.7% vs 4/115; 3.5%) but the trend was not significant due to low numbers of samples (P = 0.39). The time to process a batch of 12 samples using the established homogenization method was 23 ± 5 min (n = 10 batches). We established and validated a homogenization workflow that achieves the highest sensitivity in the microbiological diagnostic of PJI. The enrichment of the tissue homogenate in BCBs showed equally good results as the use of enrichment broth and allows semi-automated high-throughput processing while demonstrating lower contamination rates in our study.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Artrite Infecciosa/diagnóstico
18.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 109(1): 116188, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38340614

RESUMO

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are commonly diagnosed via culture-based methods, which may miss hard-to-grow pathogens. This study contrasts amplicon metagenomic sequencing (16S AS) with traditional culture techniques for enhanced clinical decision-making. We analyzed sonicate fluid from 27 patients undergoing revision arthroplasty using both methods, emphasizing the distinction between contaminants and true positives. Our findings show moderate agreement between the two methods, with a Cohen's kappa of 0.490, varying across bacterial genera (Cohen's kappa -0.059 to 1). The sensitivity of 16S AS compared to culture was 81% (95% CI, 68% to 94%). Sequencing revealed greater microbial diversity, including anaerobic genera like Anaerococcus and Citrobacter. Interestingly, several culture-negative PJI samples showed diverse bacteria via 16S AS. Despite rigorous controls and algorithms to eliminate contaminants, confirming bacteria presence with 16S AS remains a challenge. This highlights the need for improved PJI diagnostic methods, while also pointing out the limitations of next-generation sequencing (NGS) as a clinical diagnostic tool.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Artrite Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Bactérias/genética , Próteses e Implantes , Artroplastia , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética
20.
Foot Ankle Clin ; 29(1): 145-156, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38309798

RESUMO

Infections after total ankle replacement (TAR) within the first 4 weeks after implantation can be managed successfully with 1 or several debridements, irrigation, and a change of polyethylene inlay. Late infections require implant removal. Low-grade infections might be an underestimated problem so far. Although single-surgery revisions are reported in the literature, the authors' experience with 2-stage revisions using an antibiotics-loaded bone cement spacer is better. Additional antibiotics are used to support the surgical treatment. After antibiotic therapy of 12 weeks, the final treatment includes ankle or tibio-talo-calcaneal fusion and, with limitations, revision TAR.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Substituição do Tornozelo , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Artroplastia de Substituição do Tornozelo/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Articulação do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Tornozelo/cirurgia , Remoção de Dispositivo , Reoperação , Resultado do Tratamento , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...